Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082029›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Severity of error in hierarchical datasets.

Satwik Srivastava, Deepak Mishra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Satwik SrivastavaDepartment of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India. srivastava.23@iitj.ac.in.
Deepak MishraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification tasks today, especially for the medical domain, use datasets which are often hierarchical. These tasks are approached using methods that consider the class taxonomy for predicting a label. The classifiers are gradually becoming increasingly accurate over the complex datasets. While increasing accuracy is a good way to judge a model, in high-risk applications, it needs to be ensured that even if the model makes a mistake, it does not bear a severe consequence. This work explores the concept of severity of an error and extends it to the medical domain. Further, it aims to point out that accuracy or AUROC alone are not sufficient metrics to decide the performance of a model in a setting where a misclassification will incur a severe cost. Various approaches to reduce severity for classification models are compared and evaluated in this work, which indicate that while many of them might be suited for a traditional image classification setting, there is a need for techniques tailored toward tasks and settings of medical domain to push artificial intelligence in healthcare to a deployable state.

Identifiers

PMID38082029
PMCPMC10713548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.