Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082002›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Graph theory analysis reveals an assortative pain network vulnerable to attacks.

Chong Chen, Adrien Tassou, Valentina Morales, Grégory Scherrer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chong ChenDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. chong_chen@med.unc.edu.
Adrien TassouDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Valentina MoralesDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Grégory ScherrerDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. gregory_scherrer@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · US

Funding

Targeting GPCRs in amygdalar and cortical neural ensembles to treat pain aversionR01NS118504 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SCHERRER, GREGORY · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
Amygdala mechanisms of pain aversionR01NS106301 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SCHERRER, GREGORY · 2018 to 2022
$1.3M
Molecular profiling of medullary descending pain modulation circuits to discover novel analgesic targetsR21DA049241 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SCHERRER, GREGORY · 2019 to 2021
$428k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA049241NIH HHS R01NS106301NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106301NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural substrate of pain experience has been described as a dense network of connected brain regions. However, the connectivity pattern of these brain regions remains elusive, precluding a deeper understanding of how pain emerges from the structural connectivity. Here, we employ graph theory to systematically characterize the architecture of a comprehensive pain network, including both cortical and subcortical brain areas. This structural brain network consists of 49 nodes denoting pain-related brain areas, linked by edges representing their relative incoming and outgoing axonal projection strengths. Within this network, 63% of brain areas share reciprocal connections, reflecting a dense network. The clustering coefficient, a measurement of the probability that adjacent nodes are connected, indicates that brain areas in the pain network tend to cluster together. Community detection, the process of discovering cohesive groups in complex networks, successfully reveals two known subnetworks that specifically mediate the sensory and affective components of pain, respectively. Assortativity analysis, which evaluates the tendency of nodes to connect with other nodes that have similar features, indicates that the pain network is assortative. Finally, robustness, the resistance of a complex network to failures and perturbations, indicates that the pain network displays a high degree of error tolerance (local failure rarely affects the global information carried by the network) but is vulnerable to attacks (selective removal of hub nodes critically changes network connectivity). Taken together, graph theory analysis unveils an assortative structural pain network in the brain that processes nociceptive information. Furthermore, the vulnerability of this network to attack presents the possibility of alleviating pain by targeting the most connected brain areas in the network.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingCluster AnalysisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural PathwaysPain

Identifiers

PMID38082002
PMCPMC10713541
OpenAlexW4389542397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.