Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38081953›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Design and analysis of a compatible exoskeleton rehabilitation robot system based on upper limb movement mechanism.

Yuansheng Ning, Hongbo Wang, Ying Liu, Qi Wang, Yu Rong, Jianye Niu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sixty years in service to international biomedical engineering community.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuansheng NingHebei Province Key Laboratory of Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China.
Hongbo WangHebei Province Key Laboratory of Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China.
Ying LiuQinghuangdao Haigang Hospital, Qinghuangdao, China.
Qi WangHebei Province Key Laboratory of Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China.
Yu RongCollege of Vehicles and Energy, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.
Jianye NiuHebei Province Key Laboratory of Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China. jyniu@ysu.edu.cn.

Funding

National key research and development program 2019YFB1312500National Natural Science Foundation of China U1913216Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine 19MC1910500the Key research and development program of Hebei 20371801D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rehabilitation robots are used to promote structural and functional recovery of the nervous system with repetitive, task-oriented training and have been gradually applied to clinical rehabilitation training. This paper proposes an upper limb exoskeleton rehabilitation robot system that could realize shoulder-elbow-wrist joint rehabilitation training. Firstly, a motion equivalent model was established based on the upper limb movement mechanism, the robot mechanism configuration was designed, and the optimization algorithm and spatial mechanism theory were used to optimize and analyze the structural parameters and human-machine compatibility of the robot, which will guide the design of the robot's model. Then, the robot kinematics were solved, and its maximum motion range, dexterity distribution, and daily motion trajectory were simulated. Finally, a system prototype was built to test the maximum range of robot-assisted human upper limb training by laser tracker, while the pressure of human-machine interaction during training was captured and analyzed by flexible sensors. The results show that the proposed rehabilitation robot could nearly completely cover the range of motion of upper limb joints and meet the needs of trajectory training, and the linear velocity dexterity and angular velocity dexterity in the motion space are maximum 0.55 and 0.89, and the human-machine interaction pressures during the training process are all less than 10 kPa. Besides, this paper also conducted a system evaluation based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, and the evaluation result was 0.39, with an excellent evaluation grade, it indirectly indicates that the robot's overall performance was good.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceRoboticsShoulder JointHumansMovementUpper ExtremityExoskeleton rehabilitation robotsHuman–machine compatibilityPerformance analysisTraining rangeUpper limb equivalence model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.