ArticleNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2023
[
Article in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of Zircos-E® etchant, silica coating, and alumina air-particle abrasion on the debonding resistance of endocrowns with three different preparation designs.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- The Influence of Ferrule Design and Pulpal Extensions on the Accuracy of Fit and the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Endocrowns.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the influence of tooth position and retention depth of the dental pulp cavity on the accuracy of intraoral digital impression of endocrown preparation.
methodsDental pulp cavities with retention depths of 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm were prepared on 8 auatomic resin tooth models, including 4 right maxillary first molar (16) and 4 right mandibular first molar (46).Each cavity were scanned for 10 times using 3shape trios3, with micro-CT scans as the reference.All the scan data were exported, and the reference models were obtained by 3D reconstruction with Mimics 2021 software.Gomagic Wrap 2017 was used to analyze the 3D models.The average absolute deviation values were calculated to evaluate the accuracy of the digital models.
resultsThere was no significant difference in the authenticity and precision between models 16 and 46.The mean maximum positive and negative deviations of the model 16 were less than those of the model 46(
conclusionThe position of teeth has little influence on intraoral digital impression of the endocrown.The retention depth of the dental pulp cavity affects the accuracy of intraoral digital impression of the endocrown, and a greater depth results in a greater deviation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.