Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38081393›Full record

ArticleToxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA2024

Investigating the dependency of in vitro benchmark concentrations on exposure time in transcriptomics experiments.

Donatella Carpi, Roman Liska, Julia M Malinowska, Taina Palosaari, Mounir Bouhifd, Maurice Whelan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Analytical choices drive toxicogenomic potency estimates: a systematic evaluation of transcriptomic points of departure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Systematic comparison of temporal hepatotoxicant-induced gene network responses across 3 liver test systems.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donatella CarpiEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Roman LiskaEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Julia M MalinowskaEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Taina PalosaariEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Mounir BouhifdEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Maurice WhelanEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy. Electronic address: maurice.whelan@ec.europa.eu.
Joint Research Centre · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing interest to employ in vitro transcriptomics experiments in toxicological testing, for example to determine a point-of-departure (PoD) for chemical safety assessment. However current practices to derive PoD tend to utilise a single exposure time despite the importance of exposure time on the manifestation of toxicity caused by a chemical. Therefore it is important to investigate both concentration and exposure time to determine how these factors affect biological responses, and as a consequence, the derivation of PoDs. In this study, metabolically competent HepaRG cells were exposed to five known toxicants over a range of concentrations and time points for subsequent gene expression analysis, using a targeted RNA expression assay (TempO-Seq). A non-parametric factor-modelling approach was used to model the collective response of all significant genes, which exploited the interdependence of differentially expressed gene responses. This in turn allowed the determination of an isobenchmark response (isoBMR) curve for each chemical in a reproducible manner. For 2 of the 5 chemicals tested, the PoD was observed to vary by 0.5-1 log-order within the 48-h timeframe of the experiment. The approach and findings presented here clearly demonstrate the need to take both concentration and exposure time into account when designing in vitro toxicogenomics experiments to determine PoD. Doing so also provides a means to use concentration-time-response modelling as a basis to extrapolate a PoD from shorter to longer exposure durations, and to identify chemicals of concern that can cause cumulative effects over time.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingRisk AssessmentBenchmark concentrationChemical safetyHazard assessmentIn vitroPoint-of-departureToxicologyTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID38081393
PMCPMC10879918
OpenAlexW4389509959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.