ArticleActa cytologica2024
Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy as a Diagnostic Modality for Orbital Adnexal Lymphoma.
Article in Acta cytologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular adnexal lymphomas: A comprehensive review with emphasis on histopathologic and magnetic resonance imaging appearance.Histology and histopathology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) as a diagnostic tool for lymphoproliferative orbital lesions in light of recent improvements in cytomorphological and immunologic analyses.
methodRetrospective case series including all orbital FNABs with a lymphoproliferative outcome at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden during the period 2005-2015.
resultsOf the 38 patients included, 31 (82%) were conclusively diagnosed as having lymphoma according to the first FNAB. Disease in 20 patients (65%) could be subclassified. The diagnosis in 7 patients (18%) was either inconclusive, suggestive of lymphoma, or reactive lymphatic infiltrate. These 7 patients were re-investigated, and the initial suspected diagnosis of malignant lymphoma was confirmed in four. Two of the remaining 3 patients were initially diagnosed as having non-lymphoproliferative disease; however, this was later changed to a lymphoproliferative diagnosis following reinvestigation, while the results of both reFNAB and incisional biopsy were inconclusive in the third.
conclusionIn the majority of the 38 patients, a definitive diagnosis of lymphoma could be made based on FNAB alone, using cytomorphological and immunological workup, and subclassification was possible in 20 patients (65%). Primary low-grade malignant orbital lymphomas are traditionally treated with low-dose radiotherapy regardless of subtype, and incisional biopsy was not needed to initiate treatment. Our findings suggest that FNAB is a valid first option for the diagnosis of suspected orbital lymphomas due to the minimal risk of complications compared to incisional biopsy, and the fact that it can be performed as an outpatient procedure with no anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.