Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38081134›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2023

Patient Navigation for Timely, Guideline-Adherent Adjuvant Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A National Landscape Analysis.

Evan M Graboyes, Michelle Chappell, Kelsey A Duckett, Katherine Sterba, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Elizabeth G Hill, Bhishamjit Chera, Jessica McCay, Sidharth V Puram, Salma Ramadan and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Factors Associated with Head and Neck Cancer Postoperative Radiotherapy Delays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Evan M GraboyesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Michelle ChappellAmerican Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Kelsey A DuckettDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Katherine SterbaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Chanita Hughes HalbertDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Elizabeth G HillDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Bhishamjit CheraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Jessica McCayDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Sidharth V PuramDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Salma RamadanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Vlad C SandulacheBobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Russel KahmkeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Brian NussenbaumAmerican Board of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas.
Anthony J AlbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina.
Electra D PaskettDivision of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Elizabeth CalhounDepartment of Population Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Medical University of South Carolina · USWashington University in St. Louis · USAmerican Academy of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery · USAmerican Cancer Society · USBaylor College of Medicine · USDuke University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of South Carolina · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND N. DUBOIS · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
A Type I Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial to Evaluate a Navigation-Based Multilevel Intervention to Decrease Delays Starting Adjuvant Therapy Among Patients with Head and Neck CancerR01CA282165 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Evan Michael Graboyes · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
Improving the Timeliness and Equity of Adjuvant Therapy Following Surgery for Head and Neck CancerK08CA237858 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GRABOYES, EVAN MICHAEL · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237858NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NCI NIH HHS R01 CA282165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAligned with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers, in November 2021 the Commission on Cancer approved initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC) as its first and only HNC quality metric. Unfortunately, >50% of patients do not commence PORT within 6 weeks, and delays disproportionately burden racial and ethnic minority groups. Although patient navigation (PN) is a potential strategy to improve the delivery of timely, equitable, guideline-adherent PORT, the national landscape of PN for this aspect of care is unknown. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom September through November 2022, we conducted a survey of health care organizations that participate in the American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable to understand the scope of PN for delivering timely, guideline-adherent PORT for patients with HNC.

resultsOf the 94 institutions that completed the survey, 89.4% (n=84) reported that at least part of their practice was dedicated to navigating patients with HNC. Sixty-eight percent of the institutions who reported navigating patients with HNC along the continuum (56/83) reported helping them begin PORT. One-third of HNC navigators (32.5%; 27/83) reported tracking the metric for time-to-PORT at their facility. When estimating the timeframe in which the NCCN and Commission on Cancer guidelines recommend commencing PORT, 44.0% (37/84) of HNC navigators correctly stated ≤6 weeks; 71.4% (60/84) reported that they did not know the frequency of delays starting PORT among patients with HNC nationally, and 63.1% (53/84) did not know the frequency of delays at their institution.

conclusionsIn this national landscape survey, we identified that PN is already widely used in clinical practice to help patients with HNC start timely, guideline-adherent PORT. To enhance and scale PN within this area and improve the quality and equity of HNC care delivery, organizations could focus on providing better education and support for their navigators as well as specialization in HNC.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPatient NavigationCombined Modality TherapyEthnicityHumansMinority Groupscancer disparitiesguideline-adherencehead and neck cancerpatient navigationtreatment delays

Identifiers

PMID38081134
PMCPMC10846494
OpenAlexW4389537352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.