The early use of inhaled nitric oxide in premature infants requiring respiratory support.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide on ventilation/perfusion mismatch assessed by electrical impedance tomography in intubated patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS: a prospective physiological study.Respiratory research · 2026
   Trial
2. Clinical Analysis of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in Preterm Infants at Different Gestational Ages: A National Retrospective Multicenter Study.American journal of perinatology · 2025
   Article
3. Analysis of early risk factors of death in preterm infants treated with iNO: a national multicentre retrospective study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025
   Observational
4. A multicenter epidemiological survey of iNO use in preterm infants in China.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as