Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38079382›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Prevalence and predictors of use of long-term and short-acting reversible contraceptives among women of reproductive age in Wakiso and Hoima districts, Uganda: A cross-sectional study.

Malachi Ochieng Arunda, Babirye Mary Estellah, Carl Fredrik Sjöland, Emmanuel Kyasanku, Stephen Mugamba, Vitalis Ofumbi Olwa, Robert Bulamba, Phillip Kato, James Nkale, Fred Nalugoda and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Malachi Ochieng ArundaDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-0860
Babirye Mary EstellahDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl Fredrik SjölandDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-8849
Emmanuel KyasankuAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-278X
Stephen MugambaAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
Vitalis Ofumbi OlwaAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-2272
Robert BulambaAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-5041
Phillip KatoAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
James NkaleAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
Fred NalugodaAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
Grace Nalwoga KigoziAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
Gertrude NakigoziAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
Godfrey KigoziAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
Joseph KagaayiAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
Deusdedit KiwanukaAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
Stephen WatyaAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Hoima, Uganda.
Anna Mia EkströmDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elin C LarssonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEMakerere University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern contraceptive use has increased globally, but unmet needs persist in low- and middle-income countries. This study in Uganda aimed to examine the prevalence and factors influencing the use of short-acting reversible contraceptives (SARC) like pills and long-term methods such as intrauterine devices. Limited evidence exists on the use of SARC and long-term methods in Uganda. Data from the Africa Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO) Population Health Surveillance (APHS) in Hoima and Wakiso districts were analysed. Among the 1642 women aged 15-49 years, the prevalence of modern contraceptive use was 30% for SARC, and 18% for long-term method. Women with formal education were three times more likely to use long-term methods than those without formal education, relative risk ratios (RRR), 3.1-3.4, (95%CI 1.2-8.2). Joint decision-making for contraceptive use increased SARC usage, RRR 1.4 (95%CI 1.1-1.8). Urbanization played a role, with women in more urbanized Wakiso district less likely to use any modern contraception, RRR 0.6-0.7 (95%CI 0.5-0.9) compared to those living in the less urbanized Hoima. About half of the women in the study used modern contraceptives and the use of SARC was almost twice that of long-term methods. Increased access to contraception education for all women of reproductive age could significantly improve the use of long-term methods which offer more reliable protection against unintended pregnancies. The findings shed light on the need to strengthen both general and sexuality education to girls and women and to tailor contraception access for all in need, for mobile semi-urban as well as rural women. Well-informed strategies that engage young men and male partners in informed decision-making for contraceptive use could enhance progress.

Identifiers

PMID38079382
PMCPMC10712849
OpenAlexW4389547713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.