Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38079171›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Cancer Drug Price and Novelty in Mechanism of Action.

Miloš D Miljkovic, Jordan Tuia, Timothée Olivier, Alyson Haslam, Vinay Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Ethical Considerations and Implications of Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening: Reliability, Access and Cost to Test and Treat.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2025
    Article
  8. Improving the Dosing Schedules of Targeted Anticancer Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miloš D MiljkovicCartesian Therapeutics, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Jordan TuiaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Timothée OlivierDepartment of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alyson HaslamDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Vinay PrasadDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Many economic theories point to regulatory issues and subsidization of research and development costs as the primary factor in the high cancer drug prices in the US. Even so, the association between the median annual cost and novelty of cancer drugs approved in the US remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association between the median annual cost and novelty of cancer drugs approved in the US over a 6-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included all cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. Drug names, indications, manufacturer, dosage, and measures of activity/efficacy were extracted from the FDA announcement. The search was performed in December 2021. Data were analyzed from January 2022 until April 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual cost of treatment was calculated based on average wholesale price collected from the 2021 Micromedex Red Book database. Mechanism of action was inferred from trial publication or its references. Results: There were 224 cancer drug approvals across 119 individual drugs, with a median annual cost of $196 000 (IQR, $170 000-$277 000). Gene and viral therapies were the most expensive (median, $448 000 [IQR, $448 000-$479 000]), followed by small molecule therapy (median, $244 000 [IQR, $203 000-$321 000), and biologics (median, $185 000 [IQR, $148 000-$195 000]). There was no significant difference in cost between first-in-class, next-in-class, and subsequent approvals of an already approved drug. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this study indicate that the median annual price of anticancer drugs in the US is not associated with the novelty of their mechanism of action.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsBiological FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological FactorsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID38079171
PMCPMC10714245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.