ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2024
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia Distress Scale.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in chemotherapy-induced alopecia distress using the Japanese version of the Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Distress Scale.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia Distress Scale (CADS) is a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing distress associated with Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). This study aimed to confirm the psychometric validity of the Japanese version of the CADS (CADS-J).
methodsA total of 132 patients with breast cancer who developed CIA were asked to complete the CADS-J twice at 2 week intervals to confirm test-retest reliability. The body image domain of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) breast cancer-specific module, the self-esteem scale from the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the emotional domain of the EORTC QLQ Core 30 were used to confirm the convergent validity of the CADS-J. The overall quality of life and physical domains of the EORTC QLQ Core 30 were used to confirm the discriminant validity of the CADS-J.
resultsIn total, 125 participants provided valid responses. The mean age was 52.2 years. The overall Cronbach's alpha for the CADS-J was 0.903. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the first and second responses were r = 0.874, r = 0.952, r = 0.911, and r = 0.959 for the physical domain, emotional domain, activity domain, and relationship domain, respectively. In terms of convergent validity, the total CADS-J score was moderately correlated with body image (r = - 0.63), self-esteem (r = - 0.48), and the emotional domain (r = - 0.61). Regarding discriminant validity, the total CADS-J score was weakly correlated with the overall quality of life (r = - 0.34) and physical domain (r = - 0.24).
conclusionsThe CADS-J is psychometrically reliable and valid for evaluating the distress caused by CIA. It is expected to be used in daily practice and as an endpoint in various studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.