Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38079010›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2024

Safety and efficacy of biologics in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus: a critical systematic review.

Rawan Elshaer, Samar Jaber, Nour Odeh, Lana Arbili, Sulaiman M Al-Mayouf

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New Insights on Childhood Lupus Nephritis.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2025
    Review
  8. Renal disease in pediatric rheumatology.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rawan ElshaerCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4175-7520
Samar JaberCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1373-1190
Nour OdehCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9036-9906
Lana ArbiliCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4725-4214
Sulaiman M Al-MayoufCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. almayoufsulaiman@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0142-6698
Alfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologic agents are increasingly being used to treat adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the available data on biologic agents' use in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) remains limited. To collate available evidence related to the efficacy and safety of using biologic agents in cSLE. The study followed the PRISMA checklist for reporting the data and conducted a thorough search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from January 2005 to August 2023. Only articles meeting specific criteria were included, focusing on cSLE, the use of biologic agents, and having outcome measures at six- and 12-month follow-ups for safety and efficacy. Case reports were excluded, and four independent reviewers screened the articles for accuracy, with a fifth reviewer resolving any discrepancies that arose to achieve a consensus. The final selection included 18 studies with a total of 593 patients treated with biologic agents for severe and/ or refractory cSLE. The most common indication for using biologic agents was lupus nephritis. Rituximab was used in 12 studies, while belimumab was used in six studies. The studies evaluated the efficacy of biologic agents based on SLE disease activity scores, laboratory parameter improvements, and reduced corticosteroid dosage. Positive outcomes were reported, with improvements in renal, hematologic, and immunologic parameters along with mild adverse effects, mostly related to mild infections and infusion reactions. Belimumab and rituximab have shown promise as potential treatments for severe and refractory cSLE cases, leading to decreased disease activity and complete or partial remission in many patients with an acceptable safety profile. However, further research is needed to better understand their benefits and potential risks in these patients. Key Points • This review emphasizes the lack of sufficient randomized controlled trials exploring the use of biologics in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). • Treatment plans for cSLE are being derived from those used for adult systemic lupus erythematosus. • According to current evidence, belimumab and rituximab can be potential treatment options for refractory and severe cases of cSLE. • Additional studies are required to reach more definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChildHumansRituximabTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbelimumabBiological ProductsRituximabBelimumabBiologic agentsChildhood lupusDisease activityRituximab

Identifiers

PMID38079010
OpenAlexW4389553710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.