Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38078977›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2024

Disease-modifying therapies used to treat multiple sclerosis and the gut microbiome: a systematic review.

Wendy Tsai, Sophia Jette, Helen Tremlett

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wendy TsaiDivision of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Room S126, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6907-1104
Sophia JetteDivision of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Room S126, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Helen TremlettDivision of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Room S126, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada. helen.tremlett@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5804-2535
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CA

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia UBC MS Connect Summer Studentship Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gut microbiome may play a role in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its relationship with the disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) remains unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature to examine the relationship between DMTs and the gut microbiota among persons with MS (pwMS).

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (01/2007-09/2022) for studies evaluating potential gut microbiota differences in diversity, taxonomic relative abundances, and functional capacity between DMT-exposed/unexposed pwMS or before/after DMT initiation. All US FDA-approved MS DMTs (1993-09/2022) and rituximab were included.

resultsOf the 410 studies, 11 were included, totalling 1243 pwMS. Of these, 821 were DMT exposed and 473 unexposed, including 51 assessed before/after DMT initiation. DMT use duration ranged from 14 days to > 6 months. No study found a difference in gut microbiota alpha-diversity between DMT exposed/unexposed (p > 0.05). One study observed a difference in beta-diversity between interferon-beta users/DMT non-users (weighted UniFrac, p = 0.006). All studies examined taxa-level differences, but most (6) combined different DMTs. Two or more studies reported eight genera (Actinomyces, Bacteroides, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Haemophilus, Megasphaera, Pseudomonas, Ruminiclostridium 5, Turicibacter) and one species (Ruthenibacterium lactatiformans) differing in the same direction between DMT exposed/unexposed. DMT users had lower relative abundances of carbohydrate degradation and reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle I pathway than non-users (p < 0.05), but findings could not be attributed to a specific DMT. DISCUSSION: While DMT use (versus no use) was not associated with gut microbiota diversity differences, taxa-level differences were observed. Further work is warranted, as most studies were cross-sectional, few examined functionality, and DMTs were combined.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMultiple SclerosisHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunologic FactorsDisease-modifying therapyGut microbiomeMultiple sclerosisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38078977
OpenAlexW4389559659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.