Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38078955›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025

VARC-3 defined outcome of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation in stentless compared with stented aortic bioprostheses.

Jean-Honoré Steul, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Tomasz Stankowski, Stephan Haussig, Felix J Woitek, Tomasz Gasior, Lisa Crusius, Luise Knorr, Felicitas V Müller, Dirk Fritzsche and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical Outcomes of the Allegra Transcatheter System in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Failure: A Multicentre Valve-in-Valve Registry.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  3. Safety and Device Success of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A 12-Year Single-Center VARC-3 Report.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Honoré SteulDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Mohamed Abdel-WahabDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Tomasz StankowskiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Sana Heart Center Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany.
Stephan HaussigDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Felix J WoitekDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Tomasz GasiorDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Lisa CrusiusDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Luise KnorrDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Felicitas V MüllerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Dirk FritzscheDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Sana Heart Center Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany.
Philipp KieferDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Utz KappertDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
David HolzheyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Axel LinkeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Norman MangnerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Germany. norman.mangner@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-7923
Technische Universität Dresden · DELeipzig Heart Institute · DESana Klinikum · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a viable alternative to redo surgery in selected patients with bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. Most ViV-TAVI procedures have been performed in stented bioprosthetic valves (ST); stentless bioprostheses (SL) lack fluoroscopic markers and could be more challenging for ViV-TAVI. Data on more recent patients applying Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 defined outcomes are scarce. We compared patient characteristics, procedural outcomes, and 5-year mortality of patients with SL versus ST aortic bioprosthetic valve failure undergoing ViV-TAVI.

methodsPatients undergoing ViV-TAVI between 2007 and 2022 (52.5% of cases after 2015) at 3 German centers were included in this analysis. The co-primary outcome measures were technical success, device success, and early safety defined by VARC-3. Mortality was assessed up to 5 years.

resultsOverall, 43 (11.8%) SL and 313 (88.2%) ST ViV-TAVI were included. Patients were comparable with regard to age, sex, clinically relevant baseline comorbidities, and surgical risk. Technical success (SL: 83.7% versus ST: 79.9%, p = 0.552), device success (SL: 67.4% versus ST: 54.3%, p = 0.105), and early safety (SL: 74.4% versus ST: 66.5%, p = 0.296) were comparable between groups. The 30-day mortality (SL: 7.0% versus ST: 2.6%, p = 0.136) and 5-year mortality rates (SL: 23.3% versus ST: 24.6%, p = 0.874) were not significantly different between groups.

conclusionSL and ST ViV-TAVI led to comparable short-term outcomes according to VARC-3- defined endpoints and similar mortality rates up to 5 years of follow-up.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBioprosthesisHeart Valve ProsthesisStentsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansMaleProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureRetrospective StudiesStented bioprosthesisStentless bioprosthesisTranscatheter aortic valve implantationValve-in-valveVARC-3

Identifiers

PMID38078955
PMCPMC11913896
OpenAlexW4389564305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.