ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
Dynamic total-body PET/CT imaging with reduced acquisition time shows acceptable performance in quantification of [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetic modeling with total body PET-current status and future applications.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- AlEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Parametric imaging of dynamic long-axial-field-of-view PET scans: Technical challenges, statistical insights and clinical applications.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Exploring the feasibility of a 40-minute uptake time for long axial field of view [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Enhanced data usability in dynamicEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Article
- Feasibility of Early DynamicMolecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- Regional impact of time-to-equilibrium on indirect Patlak whole-body parametric imaging: a multi-tissue class analysis at the entire body level.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Optimal image-derived input function models for multi-parameter analysis and acceptably reduced acquisition time in [EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Distinguishing benign from malignant lesions with high [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Expert consensus on workflow of PET/CT with long axial field-of-view.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- Assessment of image-derived input functions from small vessels for patlak parametric imaging using total-body PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the feasibility of reducing the acquisition time for continuous dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) while retaining acceptable performance in quantifying kinetic metrics of 2-[
methodsIn total, 78 oncological patients underwent total-body dynamic PET imaging for ≥ 60 min, with 8, 20, and 50 patients receiving full activity (3.7 MBq/kg), half activity (1.85 MBq/kg), and ultra-low activity (0.37 MBq/kg) of [
resultsAll kinetic metrics in the 30-min and 45-min groups were statistically comparable to those in the ≥ 60-min group. The relative differences between the 30-min and ≥ 60-min groups ranged from 12.3% ± 15.1% for K
conclusionThe acquisition time for dynamic PET imaging can be reduced to 30 min without compromising the ability to reveal tumor kinetic metrics of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
38078950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.