Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38078899›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Comparison of Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Molecular Residual Disease Detection in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Maria Coakley, Guillermo Villacampa, Prithika Sritharan, Claire Swift, Kathryn Dunne, Lucy Kilburn, Katie Goddard, Christodoulos Pipinikas, Patricia Rojas, Warren Emmett and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA Using a Tissue-Free Epigenomic Assay Is a Highly Prognostic Biomarker in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Therapeutic Potential of Metal-Based and PARP Inhibitor Chemotherapy forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Maria CoakleyBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2658-7789
Guillermo VillacampaClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4868-6585
Prithika SritharanBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0004-9733-3596
Claire SwiftRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0003-6974-2926
Kathryn DunneRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-7259-744X
Lucy KilburnClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1987-7545
Katie GoddardClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0006-6682-4418
Christodoulos PipinikasNeoGenomics Ltd, Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-7310-167X
Patricia RojasNeoGenomics Ltd, Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4298-731X
Warren EmmettNeoGenomics Ltd, Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0002-4739-1515
Peter HallUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6015-7841
Catherine Harper-WynneMaidstone Hospital, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8414-6722
Tamas HickishUniversity Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6770-7279
Iain MacphersonThe Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow.ORCID 0000-0003-4295-8885
Alicia OkinesBreast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2068-2593
Andrew WardleyOutreach Research & Innovation Group Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9639-0888
Duncan WheatleyRoyal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1919-5114
Simon WatersVelindre Cancer Centre, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0205-4398
Carlo PalmieriClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9496-2718
Matthew WinterWeston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-9874
Rosalind J CuttsBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-9341
Isaac Garcia-MurillasBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8183-7969
Judith BlissClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7957-7424
Nicholas C TurnerBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8937-0873
Breast Cancer Now · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBBabraham Institute · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBDorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust · GBMaidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust · GBNHS Lothian · GBRoyal Cornwall Hospital Trust · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUK Research and Innovation · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBVelindre NHS Trust · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C1491/A15955NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research (BRC) A147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDetection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients who have completed treatment for early-stage breast cancer is associated with a high risk of relapse, yet the optimal assay for ctDNA detection is unknown. EXPERIMENTAL

designThe cTRAK-TN clinical trial prospectively used tumor-informed digital PCR (dPCR) assays for ctDNA molecular residual disease (MRD) detection in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. We compared tumor-informed dPCR assays with tumor-informed personalized multimutation sequencing assays in 141 patients from cTRAK-TN.

resultsMRD was first detected by personalized sequencing in 47.9% of patients, 0% first detected by dPCR, and 52.1% with both assays simultaneously (P < 0.001; Fisher exact test). The median lead time from ctDNA detection to relapse was 6.1 months with personalized sequencing and 3.9 months with dPCR (P = 0.004, mixed-effects Cox model). Detection of MRD at the first time point was associated with a shorter time to relapse compared with detection at subsequent time points (median lead time 4.2 vs. 7.1 months; P = 0.02).

conclusionsPersonalized multimutation sequencing assays have potential clinically important improvements in clinical outcome in the early detection of MRD.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNATriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualRecurrenceBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID38078899
PMCPMC10870111
OpenAlexW4389554753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.