ArticleCurrent eye research2024
Corneal Specialists' Confidence in Identifying Causal Organisms of Microbial Keratitis.
Article in Current eye research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMicrobial keratitis (MK) is a potentially blinding corneal disease caused by an array of microbial etiologies. However, the lack of early organism identification is a barrier to optimal care. We investigated clinician confidence in their diagnosis of organism type on initial presentation and the relationship between confidence and presenting features.
methodsThis research presents secondary data analysis of 72 patients from the Automated Quantitative Ulcer Analysis (AQUA) study. Cornea specialists reported their confidence in organism identification. Presenting sample characteristics were recorded including patient demographics, health history, infection morphology, symptoms, and circumstances of infection. The association between confidence and presenting characteristics was investigated with 2-sample t-tests, Wilcoxon tests, and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.
resultsClinicians reported being "confident or very confident" in their diagnosis of the causal organism in MK infections for 39 patients (54%) and "not confident" for 33 patients (46%). Confidence was not significantly associated with patient demographics, morphologic features, or symptoms related to MK. MK cases where clinicians reported they were confident, versus not confident in their diagnosis, showed significantly smaller percentages of previous corneal disease (0% versus 15%,
conclusionIn almost half of MK cases, cornea specialists reported lack of confidence in identifying the infection type. Confidence was related to ocular history and circumstances of infection but not by observable signs and symptoms or patient demographics. Tools are needed to assist clinicians with early diagnosis of MK infection type to expedite care and healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.