Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38078591›Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2024

4. Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06694974 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial for Liver Fibrosis Assessment in Diabetic Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled540ConditionsType 2 Diabetes, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver DiseaseArmsAPP calculation for FIB-4, Standard Care (in control arm)
NCT06837181 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Studying the Presence of CFRD Complications With Thoughtful Recruitment (SPeCTRuM)

TypeobservationalSponsorJaeb Center for Health ResearchRan2025 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsCystic Fibrosis (CF), Cystic Fibrosis-related Diabetes, Diabetes, RetinopathyArmsobservational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Implications of Expanded Advanced Fibrosis Screening Strategies for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Primary Care.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Effects of spironolactone on cytotoxic damage in osteoblasts.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee

Funding

Modeling and modulating insulin delivery in automated insulin delivery systems to accommodate for meal compositionsK23DK121942 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EKHLASPOUR, LAYA · 2020 to 2024
$964k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK121942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusEndocrinologyComorbidityHumansReference StandardsSocieties, MedicalStandard of Care

Identifiers

PMID38078591
PMCPMC10725809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.