ReviewDiabetes care2024
17. Diabetes Advocacy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.
Review in Diabetes care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Association of a novel index, the total cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index, with diabetes mellitus in Chinese adults: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association of the triglyceride-glucose index/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, a novel insulin resistance marker, with incident diabetes mellitus: a large-scale retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association of the TyG-GGT index, a novel insulin resistance marker, with incident diabetes mellitus: a large-scale retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Health Care Models for Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions from Populations that Experience Health Disparities: A Scoping Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Transcultural adaptation and theoretical models validation of the Spanish version of the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.