ArticleMolecular ecology2024
Forward-in-time simulation of chromosomal rearrangements: The invisible backbone that sustains long-term adaptation.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequencing, annotation and analysis of the genome ofLife science alliance · 2026Article
- Structural Mutations Set an Equilibrium Noncoding Genome Fraction.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Genome Streamlining: Effect of Mutation Rate and Population Size on Genome Size Reduction.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Forward-in-time simulation of chromosomal rearrangements: The invisible backbone that sustains long-term adaptation.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
- Innovation in viruses: fitness valley crossing, neutral landscapes, or just duplications?Virus evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While chromosomal rearrangements are ubiquitous in all domains of life, very little is known about their evolutionary significance, mostly because, apart from a few specifically studied and well-documented mechanisms (interaction with recombination, gene duplication, etc.), very few models take them into account. As a consequence, we lack a general theory to account for their direct and indirect contributions to evolution. Here, we propose Aevol, a forward-in-time simulation platform specifically dedicated to unravelling the evolutionary significance of chromosomal rearrangements (CR) compared to local mutations (LM). Using the platform, we evolve populations of organisms in four conditions characterized by an increasing diversity of mutational operators-from substitutions alone to a mix of substitutions, InDels and CR-but with a constant global mutational rate. Despite being almost invisible in the phylogeny owing to the scarcity of their fixation in the lineages, we show that CR make a decisive contribution to the evolutionary dynamics by comparing the outcome in these four conditions. As expected, chromosomal rearrangements allow fast expansion of the gene repertoire through gene duplication, but they also reduce the effect of diminishing-returns epistasis, hence sustaining adaptation on the long-run. At last, we show that chromosomal rearrangements tightly regulate the size of the genome through indirect selection for reproductive robustness. Overall, these results confirm the need to improve our theoretical understanding of the contribution of chromosomal rearrangements to evolution and show that dedicated platforms like Aevol can efficiently contribute to this agenda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.