ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Comparison of clinical outcomes following delivery of budesonide by both vibrating mesh nebulizer and jet nebulizer in premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vibrating Mesh and Jet Nebulizer Performance in Pediatric Respiratory Support: A Multi-Modality In Vitro Comparison.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Improving Pulmonary Delivery of Budesonide Suspensions Nebulized with Constant-Output Vibrating Mesh Nebulizers by Using Valved Holding Chamber.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of budesonide inhalation suspension administered via a vibrating mesh nebulizer vs. a jet nebulizer in the treatment of premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) undergoing high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Methods: Between July 2020 and July 2022, we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 36 preterm infants diagnosed with BPD who underwent HFOV. Based on the nebulizer type used, infants were categorized into the vibrating mesh nebulizer group (VMN group) or the jet nebulizer group (JN group). Post-nebulization outcomes, such as the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), ventilator-associated parameters, and arterial blood gas metrics, were compared between the two groups. Treatment-associated complications were also documented. Results: No significant differences were noted between the VMN and JN groups in terms of mechanical ventilation duration ( Conclusion: Among premature infants with BPD on HFOV, for administration of budesonide inhalation suspension resulted in an improved oxygenation index and reduced arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide when compared to a jet nebulizer, indicating superior therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.