ArticleCase reports in gastroenterology
Gastric Glomus Tumors: The Roles of Endoscopic Ultrasound and Shared Decision-Making.
Article in Case reports in gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Uncommon Result in a Common Finding: The Rare Case of a Gastric Glomus Tumor.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Gastric glomus tumor with a rare presentation: a case report and review of the literature.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Endoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge-resection of gastric glomus tumor: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
- Thoracoscopic enucleation of an esophageal glomus tumor in the prone position: a case report and literature review.Surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Case report: One case of precise resection of gastric glomus tumor by gastroscopy combined with laparoscopy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric glomus tumors (GGTs) are mesenchymal neoplasms with indolent behavior that originate from the subepithelial layers of the stomach and represent up to 1% of all gastric tumors. GGT is detected incidentally during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in a proportion of patients. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) evaluation of GGT is essential to establish the diagnosis and to differentiate it from gastrointestinal stromal tumors or gastric neuroendocrine tumors. An 80-year-old man who presented for abdominal discomfort was incidentally found to have a gastric antral nodule on EGD. Endoscopic biopsy demonstrated moderately erythematous gastric antral mucosa and a 1.5 cm subepithelial lesion along the greater curvature. An EUS revealed a subepithelial 1.6 cm × 1.3 cm isoechoic, homogenous lesion with small calcifications. Immunohistochemical staining of the fine needle biopsy specimen of the nodule was positive for neoplastic cells, smooth muscle actin, vimentin, patchy muscle-specific actin, and synaptophysin. There were no atypical cytologic features. These findings were consistent with GGT. The patient was not deemed to be a candidate for surgical resection due to advanced age and resolution of his symptoms. A shared decision was made to pursue regular surveillance. EUS is essential for evaluation of GGT. Currently, there are no guideline recommendations for surveillance of GGT detected on routine EGD in asymptomatic individuals. A definitive surgical treatment with partial gastrectomy was favored in previously published literature. For asymptomatic patients with GGT or those with resolution of symptoms, careful surveillance with serial abdominal imaging and EUS may be a reasonable option, especially in older patients with poor surgical candidacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.