Genetic breakthroughs in the

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. When MED16 Meets Plant Growth, Development, and Stress Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
   Review
2. A retrotransposon insertion upstream of Arabidopsis thaliana CRK8 receptor-like kinase modulates a trade-off between pathogen defense and salt tolerance.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
   Article
3. Genome editing in vegetable crops: a new era of sustainable agriculture.Molecular biology reports · 2025
   Review
4. Peptide Hormone-Mediated Regulation of Plant Development and Environmental Adaptability.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
   Review
5. Global mRNA profiling reveals the effect of boron as a crop protection tool againstAoB PLANTS · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as