Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38078116›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Diverse plant promoting bacterial species differentially improve tomato plant fitness under water stress.

Elisa Zampieri, Elisabetta Franchi, Luca Giovannini, Francesca Brescia, Fabiano Sillo, Danilo Fusini, Ilaria Pietrini, Mauro Centritto, Raffaella Balestrini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrative Exploration ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Biocontrol ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa Zampieri *Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council of Italy, Turin, Italy.
Elisabetta Franchi *Eni S.p.A., R&D Environmental & Biological Laboratories, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Luca Giovannini *Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council of Italy, Turin, Italy.
Francesca BresciaInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council of Italy, Turin, Italy.
Fabiano SilloInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council of Italy, Turin, Italy.
Danilo FusiniEni S.p.A., R&D Environmental & Biological Laboratories, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Ilaria PietriniEni S.p.A., R&D Environmental & Biological Laboratories, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Mauro CentrittoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council of Italy, Turin, Italy.
Raffaella BalestriniInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council of Italy, Turin, Italy.
National Research Council · ITEni (Italy) · ITInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Food crops are increasingly susceptible to the challenging impacts of climate change, encompassing both abiotic and biotic stresses, that cause yield losses. Root-associated microorganisms, including plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), can improve plant growth as well as plant tolerance to environmental stresses. The aims of this work were to characterize bacteria isolated from soil and roots of tomato plants grown in open field. Methods: Biochemical and molecular analyses were used to evaluate the PGP potential of the considered strains on tomato plants in controlled conditions, also assessing their effects under a water deficit condition. The isolated strains were classified by 16S gene sequencing and exhibited typical features of PGPB, such as the release of siderophores, the production of proteases, and phosphorous solubilization. Inoculating tomato plants with eleven selected strains led to the identification of potentially interesting strains that increased shoot height and dry weight. Three strains were then selected for the experiment under water deficit in controlled conditions. The tomato plants were monitored from biometric and physiological point of view, and the effect of inoculation at molecular level was verified with a targeted RT-qPCR based approach on genes that play a role under water deficit condition. Results: Results revealed the PGP potential of different bacterial isolates in tomato plants, both in well-watered and stressed conditions. The used integrated approach allowed to obtain a broader picture of the plant status, from biometric, eco-physiological and molecular point of view. Gene expression analysis showed a different regulation of genes involved in pathways related to abscisic acid, osmoprotectant compounds and heat shock proteins, depending on the treatments. Discussion: Overall, results showed significant changes in tomato plants due to the bacterial inoculation, also under water deficit, that hold promise for future field applications of these bacterial strains, suggesting that a synergistic and complementary interaction between diverse PGPB is an important point to be considered for their exploitation.

Indexed as

16Sabiotic stressgene expressionin vitro characterizationPGPBSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID38078116
PMCPMC10706133
OpenAlexW4388968464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.