Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38078061›Full record

ArticleBiofilm2023

To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections - That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board.

Niels Høiby, Claus Moser, Antonio Oliver, Craig Williams, Gordon Ramage, Elisa Borghi, Joana Azeredo, Maria Dolores Macia, ESGB board

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biofilm, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fluoroquinolones and Biofilm: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Niels HøibyEuropean Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Study Group for Biofilms (ESGB), Denmark.
Claus MoserEuropean Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Study Group for Biofilms (ESGB), Denmark.
Antonio OliverEuropean Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Study Group for Biofilms (ESGB), Denmark.
Craig WilliamsEuropean Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Study Group for Biofilms (ESGB), Denmark.
Gordon RamageEuropean Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Study Group for Biofilms (ESGB), Denmark.
Elisa BorghiEuropean Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Study Group for Biofilms (ESGB), Denmark.
Joana AzeredoEuropean Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Study Group for Biofilms (ESGB), Denmark.
Maria Dolores MaciaEuropean Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Study Group for Biofilms (ESGB), Denmark.
ESGB board

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The work on the ESGB guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections began in 2012 and the result was published in 2014. The guidelines have been and still are frequently cited in the literature proving its usefulness for people working with biofilm infections. At the ESGB Biofilm conference in Mallorca 2022 (Eurobiofilms2022) the board of the ESGB decided to evaluate the 2014-guidelines and relevant publications since 2014 based on a lecture given at the Eurobiofilms2022. Guideline methods: The Delphi method for working on production of guidelines and the current ESCMID rules for guidelines are presented. The criteria for evaluation of relevant literature are very strict and especially for treatment, most clinicians and regulatory authorities require convincing results from Level I (randomized controlled trials) publications to justify changes of treatments. The relevant new biofilm literature and the relevant biofilm presentations from the Eurobiofilms meetings and ECCMID conferences was used for evaluating the contemporary relevance of the ESGB 2014 guidelines. Diagnosis of biofilm infections: Several infectious diseases have been recognized as biofilm infections since 2014, but the diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies are still the same as recommended in the 2014 ESGB guidelines which are summarized in this opinion paper. Treatment of biofilm infections: Some promising new Conclusion: The interim opinion at the present time (2022) is therefore, that the guidelines do not need revision now, but there is a need for survey articles discussing new methods of diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections in order - hopefully - to give inspiration to conduct clinical trials which may lead to progress in diagnosis and treatment of patients with biofilm infections.

Identifiers

PMID38078061
PMCPMC10704329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.