ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2023
The Profile of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic: A 5-Year Experience.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of COVID-19 on the Guillain-Barré Syndrome Incidence.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Clinical and immunological features in patients with neuroimmune complications of COVID-19 during Omicron wave in China: a case series.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and electrophysiological features of post-COVID-19 Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and non-COVID-19 GBS patients over the last five years. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with GBS between October 2016 and September 2021. They were divided into five groups according to the flu season and the COVID-19 pandemic. Groups 1-4 were identified as non-COVID-19 groups, whereas Group 5 constituted the post-COVID-19 group. At the sixth month the Hughes functional grading scale score (HFGSS) was noted. Clinical and electrophysiological findings were compared between the groups. Results: Fifty-nine GBS patients were enrolled in this study. Post-COVID-19 GBS patients had more facial diplegia than non-COVID-19 GBS patients. Except for facial diplegia, post-COVID-19 GBS patients did not differ from non-COVID-19 GBS patients regarding the need for mechanical ventilation, loss of ambulation, type of GBS, response to treatment, and patient outcomes. In 67% of post-COVID-19 GBS patients, HFGSS was ≤2. Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) was the most common subtype in post-COVID-19 GBS patients. The 2018-2019 flu season saw more ambulation loss than other flu seasons. The 2017-2018 influenza season had the highest number of patients (39%). Conclusion: The clinical and electrophysiological features of GBS may differ according to year, infectious etiology, and severity of seasonal viral infections. Post-COVID-19 GBS patients mostly had the AIDP subtype with frequent facial diplegia. The prognosis of post-COVID-19 GBS patients was good. The patients responded well to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.