ReviewOpen life sciences2023
Research progress of serum eosinophil in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.
Review in Open life sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The predictive value of combined detection of serum IL-33, TSLP and eosinophils in the treatment effect and exacerbation risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Εosinophilic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. What Do We Know So Far?Pulmonary therapy · 2025Review
- Diagnostic value of IgE, fractional of exhaled nitric oxide, and peripheral blood eosinophils in adult bronchial asthma and their relationship with disease severity.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Explainable machine learning model for predicting acute exacerbations of COPD combining sarcopenia index and traditional risk factors: A retrospective single-center exploratory study.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common airway diseases, and there are similarities and differences between them. Serum eosinophil (EOS) has potential application value in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of COPD and asthma. However, the clinical application value of serum EOS in these two diseases is controversial. In this work, recent research progress on the application of serum EOS in COPD and asthma was analyzed, and the potential application of serum EOS in the two diseases was expounded from several aspects, including the correlation between the pathogenesis of COPD and asthma and EOS, as well as the correlation between the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the two diseases and serum EOS. The results revealed that serum EOS was important in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of COPD and asthma and exhibited a potential clinical application value. However, further study was needed to evaluate the threshold, which provided guidance for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of COPD and asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.