Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38077747›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602023

Acceptability Criteria of Precision Medicine: Lessons From Patients' Experiences With the GUIDE-IBD Trial Regarding the Use of Mobile Health Technology.

Anke Erdmann, Florian Schrinner, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Andre Franke, Ursula Seidler, Stefan Schreiber, Claudia Bozzaro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anke ErdmannInstitute for Experimental Medicine, Medical Ethics Working Group, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3708-8889
Florian SchrinnerInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology (IKMB), Genetics & Bioinformatics Research Group, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Christoph Rehmann-SutterInstitute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Andre FrankeInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology (IKMB), Genetics & Bioinformatics Research Group, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Ursula SeidlerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Stefan SchreiberInternal Medicine I Clinic, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Claudia BozzaroInstitute for Experimental Medicine, Medical Ethics Working Group, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research about mobile health technologies for inflammatory bowel diseases reveals that these devices are mainly used to predict or self-report disease activity. However, in the near future these tools can be used to integrate large data sets into machine learning for the development of personalized treatment algorithms. The impact of these technologies on patients' well-being and daily lives has not yet been investigated. Methods: We conducted 10 qualitative interviews with patients who used the GUIDE-IBD mHealth technology. This is a special smartphone app for patients to record patient-reported outcomes and a wearable to track physical activity, heart rate, and sleep quality. For data analysis, we used interpretative phenomenological analysis. This method is ideally suited for studying people's lived experiences. Results: The analysis of the data revealed 11 themes that were mentioned by at least 3 participants. These themes were: Self-tracking with wearable devices as normality; variable value of the data from the wearable; risk of putting people under pressure; stimulus to reflect on their own well-being and illness; risk of psychological distress; discussion about app data in the medical consultation is very brief or nonexistent; easier to be honest with an app than with a doctor; questionnaires do not always adequately capture the patient's condition; need for support; the possibility to look at the data retrospectively; and annoyed by additional tasks. Conclusions: Patients identified benefits, risks, and potentials for improvement, which should be considered in the further development of the devices and patient-reported outcome scales, and in the implementation of usual care.

Indexed as

benefitCrohn’s diseaseethicsmobile healthriskulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID38077747
PMCPMC10710013
OpenAlexW4388579213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.