Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38077680›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Data Mounts: 261 Cleft Lifts for Complex Pilonidal Disease and Excisional Failures.

Brian Shrager

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian ShragerSurgery, Pilonidal Treatment Center of New Jersey, Hackettstown, USA.
Filtration Solutions (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Bascom cleft-lift procedure is a superior approach for treating pilonidal disease. The purpose of this study was to establish healing time after cleft-lift, operative success, and any associated clinical or operative variables.

methodsThe study group comprises all patients who underwent cleft-lift procedures at our center between December 2021 and February 2023. Many clinical and operative variables were collected before surgery. Postoperatively, patients were examined every two weeks until full epithelialization was achieved; thereafter, they were seen at 6, 16, and 30 months and as needed for recurrence surveillance. A successful cleft-lift was defined as one that fully healed by 120 days and showed no recurrence within 18 months of follow-up. Patients with failed cleft lifts were offered revision.

resultsIn total, 261 cleft -lifts were performed in 258 patients. Of these patients, 40.3% had at least one previous excisional surgery and 19.4% had a chronically open surgical wound. The median follow-up time was 19.8 (6.5 to 25.5) months. There were a total of 12 failed cleft-lifts, yielding an operative success rate of 95.4%. Recurrence was detected in two (0.08%) cases. The median healing time was 43 (15-387) days and did not differ by any covariate. Previous Limberg flap surgery and a shorter distance from the inferior extent of the wound/disease to the anal mucosa were associated with decreased operative success.

conclusionOur data reinforce that the cleft-lift procedure is a highly successful cure for this disease and its surgical failures. Notably, the operation was a successful cure for many patients with extensive disease and previously failed excisional surgeries, including flap reconstructions.

Indexed as

bascom cleft-liftpilonidal cystpilonidal excisionpilonidal sinuspilonidal wound

Identifiers

PMID38077680
PMCPMC10705818
OpenAlexW4389489484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.