ArticleCureus2023
Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Influence the Awareness About Vitamin D Among the General Population in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia?
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correlation between rs7041 and rs4588 polymorphisms in vitamin D binding protein gene and COVID-19-related severity and mortality.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Vitamin D deficiency has been a major health concern over the last decade. With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, health officials and social media have stressed the importance of vitamin D and its role in immune systems. This research focused on the level of vitamin D awareness in Jeddah after the pandemic in 2022. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted among the adult general population in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Data were obtained through an electronically distributed questionnaire designed to collect information on self-reported knowledge questions about vitamin D, which was previously validated and used in a similar study on the same population before the pandemic. The validated questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics and questions assessing the knowledge about vitamin D. Ethical approvals were obtained from the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Results Of the 385 total participants, 198 (51.4%) were aged 18-28 years, 331 (86%) were of Arab ethnicity, 289 (75.1%) had a university degree, 86 (22.3%) had completed high school, 186 (48.3%) were married, and 197 (51.2%) had no children. The overall mean knowledge score was 67.12%, and the mean knowledge score for vitamin D benefits was 73.51%. The mean knowledge score for vitamin D sources was 51.53%, and the mean knowledge score for toxicity was 86.49%. When comparing knowledge scores based on demographic variables, only a few variables were significant. Regarding vitamin D awareness following the COVID-19 pandemic, most participants (54.55%) believed the pandemic had affected or increased their vitamin D awareness. Approximately 52.85% had used vitamin D supplements before the pandemic, and 53.25% were currently using vitamin D supplements. Conclusions In general, compared to pre-COVID-19 studies conducted in Saudi Arabia, this study revealed a greater understanding of vitamin D. Participants who had completed high school or more displayed a higher level of knowledge than other groups. It is still recommended that primary care physicians educate their patients and families about the benefits of vitamin D, the effects of its deficiency, and its toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.