ArticleCureus2023
Enhancing Patient Care With the "David and Wendy" Approach: The Effectiveness of Ward Round Documentation Proformas.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Surgical ward round documentation, essential for high-quality patient care, is often completed poorly. The advent of electronic medical records offers an opportunity to introduce proformas, aiding junior staff in completing notes both timely and accurately. We aimed to assess whether the introduction of a proforma would improve the quality and speed of ward round documentation. Methods We completed a prospective cohort analysis of ward round documentation at a single institution. Analysis was conducted on the documentation of a single surgical team over a 10-week period, comprising five weeks of baseline data collection followed by five weeks with implementation of a proforma. This proforma was based on the "David & Wendy" acronym, encompassing diet, activity, vital signs, investigations/IV therapy, drains/lines, wound assessment, examination findings, nursing concerns, drugs/deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, and barriers to discharge. Results A total of 711 ward round notes were analyzed, 349 with proforma and 362 without. Statistically significant improvements were observed in the documentation of diet, activity, investigations/IV therapy, drains/lines, wound assessment, nursing concerns, drugs/DVT prophylaxis, and barriers to discharge (p < 0.05) with proforma use. No significant difference was noted in the documentation of vital signs or examination findings. The time taken to finalize ward round notes was significantly reduced with the proforma (M = 31.28 vs. 60.05 minutes, p < 0.001). Conclusion The introduction of the David & Wendy proforma significantly improved the speed and quality of documentation for key surgical ward round information during our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.