ArticleForensic Science International. Reports2022
A new implementation of a semi-continuous method for DNA mixture interpretation.
Article in Forensic Science International. Reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An overview of log likelihood ratio cost in forensic science - Where is it used and what values can we expect?Forensic science international. Synergy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A new calculation module within the PopStats module of the CODIS software package, based on the underlying mathematics presented in the MixKin software package, has been developed for assigning the Likelihood Ratio (LR) of DNA mixture profiles. This module uses a semi-continuous model that allows for population structure and allelic drop-out and drop-in but does not require allelic peak heights or other laboratory-specific parameters. This new implementation (named SC Mixture), like MixKin, does not specify or estimate a probability of drop-out. Instead, each contributor to a mixture has an independent drop-out rate, and the probability of the mixture profile for a specified proposition concerning the contributors is integrated over the range of possible drop-out rates. The allelic drop-in rate and the population structure parameter, theta, used by the software are specified by the user. The user can examine up to five contributors to a mixture, however, conditioning on assumed contributors and limiting the number of unknowns in both numerator and denominator hypotheses greatly improves performance. We report results from an extensive validation study performed for ten mixtures with each of one (single source), two, three, four, or five contributors, with four combinations of drop-in rate and a population structure parameter. Each mixture was run as a complete profile or with the random removal of alleles to simulate drop-out. All 1620 combinations were evaluated with PopStats, MixKin, and LRmix and considerable consistency was found among the results with all three packages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.