Application of convolutional neural network-based endoscopic imaging in esophageal cancer or high-grade dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

backgroundEsophageal cancer is the seventh-most common cancer type worldwide, accounting for 5% of death from malignancy. Development of novel diagnostic techniques has facilitated screening, early detection, and improved prognosis. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based image analysis promises great potential for diagnosing and determining the prognosis of esophageal cancer, enabling even early detection of dysplasia.

aimTo conduct a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of CNN models for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia (HGD).

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published up to November 30, 2022. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of using the CNN model with still image-based analysis and with video-based analysis for esophageal cancer or HGD, as well as for the invasion depth of esophageal cancer. The pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) were estimated, together with the 95% confidence intervals (CI). A bivariate method and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic method were used to calculate the diagnostic test accuracy of the CNN model. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to identify sources of heterogeneity.

resultsA total of 28 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Using still image-based analysis for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer or HGD provided a pooled sensitivity of 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92-0.97), pooled specificity of 0.92 (0.89-0.94), PLR of 11.5 (8.3-16.0), NLR of 0.06 (0.04-0.09), DOR of 205 (115-365), and AUC of 0.98 (0.96-0.99). When video-based analysis was used, a pooled sensitivity of 0.85 (0.77-0.91), pooled specificity of 0.73 (0.59-0.83), PLR of 3.1 (1.9-5.0), NLR of 0.20 (0.12-0.34), DOR of 15 (6-38) and AUC of 0.87 (0.84-0.90) were found. Prediction of invasion depth resulted in a pooled sensitivity of 0.90 (0.87-0.92), pooled specificity of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.76-0.88), PLR of 7.8 (1.9-32.0), NLR of 0.10 (0.41-0.25), DOR of 118 (11-1305), and AUC of 0.95 (0.92-0.96).

conclusionCNN-based image analysis in diagnosing esophageal cancer and HGD is an excellent diagnostic method with high sensitivity and specificity that merits further investigation in large, multicenter clinical trials.