Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38077607›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Modeling emotional contagion in the COVID-19 pandemic: a complex network approach.

Yanchun Zhu, Wei Zhang, Chenguang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanchun ZhuBusiness School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Wei ZhangSchool of Information, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China.
Chenguang LiSchool of Insurance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During public health crises, the investigation into the modes of public emotional contagion assumes paramount theoretical importance and has significant implications for refining epidemic strategies. Prior research predominantly emphasized the antecedents and aftermath of emotions, especially those of a negative nature. The interplay between positive and negative emotions, as well as their role in the propagation of emotional contagion, remains largely unexplored. In response to this gap, an emotional contagion model was developed, built upon the foundational model and enriched from a complex network standpoint by integrating a degradation rate index. Stability analyses of this model were subsequently conducted. Drawing inspiration from topological structural features, an enhanced model was introduced, anchored in complex network principles. This enhanced model was then experimentally assessed using Watts-Strogatz's small-world network, Barabási-Albert's scale-free network, and Sina Weibo network frameworks. Results revealed that the rate of infection predominantly dictates the velocity of emotional contagion. The incitement rate and purification rate determine the overarching direction of emotional contagion, whereas the degradation rate modulates the waning pace of emotions during intermediate and later stages. Furthermore, the immunity rate was observed to influence the proportion of each state at equilibrium. It was discerned that a greater number of initial emotional disseminators, combined with a larger initial contagion node degree, can amplify the emotion contagion rate across the social network, thus augmenting both the peak and overall influence of the contagion.

Indexed as

Complex networkEmotional contagionInfectious disease modelSocial network

Identifiers

PMID38077607
PMCPMC10702993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.