ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Student learning performance prediction based on online behavior: an empirical study during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Controlling Myopia: Insights from a Nation-Wide Clinical Practice Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- SAPPNet: students' academic performance prediction during COVID-19 using neural network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic, highly intense and frequent online teaching has leapt to be one of the dominant learning patterns and become an ordinary situation in university teaching practices. In recent years, progress in feature engineering and machine learning has made it possible for more effective educational data mining, which in turn has enhanced the performance of intelligent learning models. However, the potential impact of increasing and varying features on online instruction in this new situation makes it unclear whether the existing related findings and results are practical for teachers. In this article, we use various state-of-the-art machine learning techniques to predict students' performance. Based on the validation of the rationality of the built models, the importance of features under different feature selection techniques are calculated separately for the datasets of two groups and compared with the features before and at the beginning of the pandemic. The results show that in the current new state of highly intense online learning, without considering student information such as demographic information, campus attributes (administrative class and teaching class) and learning behavior (completion of online learning tasks and stage tests) these dynamic features are more likely to discriminate students' academic performances, which deserves more attention than demographics for teachers in the guidance of students' learning. In addition, it is suggested that further improvements and refinements should be made to the existing features, such as classifying features more precisely and expanding in these feature categories, and taking into account the statistics about students' in-class performances as well as their subjective understanding of what they have learned. Our findings are in line with the new situation under the pandemic and provide more implications to teachers' teaching guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.