ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Semi-supervised learning and bidirectional decoding for effective grammar correction in low-resource scenarios.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Grammatical error correction for low-resource languages: a review of challenges, strategies, computational and future directions.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Dynamic decoding and dual synthetic data for automatic correction of grammar in low-resource scenario.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The correction of grammatical errors in natural language processing is a crucial task as it aims to enhance the accuracy and intelligibility of written language. However, developing a grammatical error correction (GEC) framework for low-resource languages presents significant challenges due to the lack of available training data. This article proposes a novel GEC framework for low-resource languages, using Arabic as a case study. To generate more training data, we propose a semi-supervised confusion method called the equal distribution of synthetic errors (EDSE), which generates a wide range of parallel training data. Additionally, this article addresses two limitations of the classical seq2seq GEC model, which are unbalanced outputs due to the unidirectional decoder and exposure bias during inference. To overcome these limitations, we apply a knowledge distillation technique from neural machine translation. This method utilizes two decoders, a forward decoder right-to-left and a backward decoder left-to-right, and measures their agreement using Kullback-Leibler divergence as a regularization term. The experimental results on two benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed framework outperforms the Transformer baseline and two widely used bidirectional decoding techniques, namely asynchronous and synchronous bidirectional decoding. Furthermore, the proposed framework reported the highest F1 score, and generating synthetic data using the equal distribution technique for syntactic errors resulted in a significant improvement in performance. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework for improving grammatical error correction for low-resource languages, particularly for the Arabic language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.