ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Skeletal age evaluation using hand X-rays to determine growth problems.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated MRI-based framework combining deep learning localization and machine learning classification for pubertal olecranon bone age assessment.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- A practical tip for estimating skeletal maturation in children aged < 3 years using humeral ossification on chest radiographs: A retrospective study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Advances in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Assistive Diagnosis in Pain Clinics.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Bone Age Assessment Using Various Medical Imaging Techniques Enhanced by Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- BAE-ViT: An Efficient Multimodal Vision Transformer for Bone Age Estimation.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A common clinical method for identifying anomalies in bone growth in infants and newborns is skeletal age estimation with X-ray images. Children's bone abnormalities can result from several conditions including wounds, infections, or tumors. One of the most frequent reasons for bone issues is that most youngsters are affected by the slow displacement of bones caused by pressure applied to the growth plates as youngsters develop. The growth plate can be harmed by a lack of blood supply, separation from other parts of the bone, or slight misalignment. Problems with the growth plate prevent bones from developing, cause joint distortion, and may cause permanent joint injury. A significant discrepancy between the chronological and assessed ages may indicate a growth problem because determining bone age represents the real level of growth. Therefore, skeletal age estimation is performed to look for endocrine disorders, genetic problems, and growth anomalies. To address the bone age assessment challenge, this study uses the Radiological Society of North America's Pediatric Bone Age Challenge dataset which contains 12,600 radiological images of the left hand of a patient that includes the gender and bone age information. A bone age evaluation system based on the hand skeleton guidelines is proposed in this study for the detection of hand bone maturation. The proposed approach is based on a customized convolutional neural network. For the calculation of the skeletal age, different data augmentation techniques are used; these techniques not only increase the dataset size but also impact the training of the model. The performance of the model is assessed against the Visual Geometry Group (VGG) model. Results demonstrate that the customized convolutional neural network (CNN) model outperforms the VGG model with 97% accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.