ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Design of innovation ability evaluation model based on IPSO-LSTM in intelligent teaching.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guided by the development of an innovative economy, students' innovative education has also become the focus of talent training. This research aims to realize the intelligent evaluation of students' innovation ability. In this article, we proposed an innovation ability framework that integrates students' psychological state and innovation evaluation indicators. Firstly, the qualitative description of psychological data is quantified using the Delphi method. Secondly, this article proposes an improved particle swarm optimization-long short-term memory (IPSO-LSTM) model to achieve high-precision evaluation and classification of innovation capabilities. The classification accuracy of this model for excellent, general and failed innovation capabilities is up to 95.3%. Finally, the characteristic contribution analysis of psychological and innovative ability characteristics is carried out. The results show that the evaluation of creative ability contributes more than 50% to the psychological aspects of excellent students. This shows the importance of psychological status on creative ability and provides a theoretical basis for integrating innovative education and psychological education in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.