ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2023
Computer-assisted orbital and midfacial reconstruction.
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microsurgical reconstruction in midface defects based on defect morphology and size - Reconstruction techniques, complications, and outcomes.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Personalized 3D-Printed Hybrid PDMS and PEEK Implants for Revisional Orbitomaxillary Reconstruction: A Translational Case-Based Technical Note.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Advanced Manufacturing of PLA Surgical Templates for Orbital Floor Geometry: Optimizing Fidelity and Surface Morphology via Variable Layer Height MEX 3D Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reconstruction for Skin Defects Occurring due to Resection of Midface Malignancies with Cervicofacial Advancement-Rotational Flap.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Presurgical Virtual Planning and Intraoperative Navigation with 3D-Preformed Mesh: A New Protocol for Primary Orbital Fracture Reconstruction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Computer assistance has become indispensable in the reconstruction of the orbit and midface. Although these are key areas of an individual's esthetic appearance, defects or deformities of the midface, especially those of the orbit, are treated diversely. Methods: The aim of this article is to present the wide utility of computer-assistance in modern craniomaxillofacial surgery, including virtual planning, computer-aided design, guided surgery, navigational control, patient-specific implants, and quality control via image fusion. Results: There have been rapid advances in both digital planning and manufacturing processes, with continual improvements. Conclusions: Patient-specific implants have pushed the boundaries of reconstructive surgery in all surgical specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.