Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38077486›Full record

ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2023

Virtual planning for mandible resection and reconstruction.

Florian Andreas Probst, Paris Liokatis, Gerson Mast, Michael Ehrenfeld

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07365085 (Whole Versus Segmented In-House 3D Mandibular Guides for Mandibular Reconstruction Using Free Fibular Flaps), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07365085 nacompletednot on this map

Whole Versus Segmented In-House 3D Mandibular Guides for Mandibular Reconstruction Using Free Fibular Flaps: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled36Conditions3d Printing, Facial Symmetry, Free Fibular Flap, 3d ModelArms3D-printed surgical guide - segmented model, 3D-printed surgical guide - whole mandible model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current Trends and Innovations in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Florian Andreas ProbstDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Paris LiokatisDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Gerson MastDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Michael EhrenfeldDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mandibular reconstruction, computer-assisted procedures, including virtual surgical planning (VSP) and additive manufacturing (AM), have become an integral part of routine clinical practice. Especially complex cases with extensive defects after ablative tumor surgery benefit from a computer-assisted approach. Various CAD/CAM-manufactured tools such as surgical guides (guides for osteotomy, resection and predrilling) support the transition from virtual planning to surgery. Patient-specific implants (PSIs) are of particular value as they facilitate both osteosynthesis and the positioning of bone elements. Computer-based approaches may be associated with higher accuracy, efficiency, and superior patient outcomes. However, certain limitations should be considered, such as additional costs or restricted availability. In the future, automation of the planning process and augmented reality techniques, as well as MRI as a non-ionizing imaging modality, have the potential to further improve the digital workflow.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingCAD/CAMcomputer-assisted surgerycraniomaxillofacial surgery

Identifiers

PMID38077486
PMCPMC10709695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.