ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023
Use of Novel Open-Source Deep Learning Platform for Quantification of Ki-67 in Neuroendocrine Tumors - Analytical Validation.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Grading medullary thyroid carcinoma on fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens: a comparative study between manual counting and a deep learning platform.Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi scale deep learning quantifies Ki67 index in breast cancer histopathology images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ki67 in cytological specimens of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A literature review and validation of automated quantification.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Does Tumor Location Affect Prognosis?Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a diverse group of neoplasms that arise from neuroendocrine cells, with Ki-67 immunostaining serving as a crucial biomarker for assessing tumor proliferation and prognosis. Accurate and reliable quantification of Ki-67 labeling index is essential for effective clinical management. Methods: We aimed to evaluate the performance of open-source/open-access deep learning cloud-native platform, DeepLIIF (https://deepliif.org), for the quantification of Ki-67 expression in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors and compare it with the manual quantification method. Results: Our results demonstrate that the DeepLIIF quantification of Ki-67 in NETs achieves a high degree of accuracy with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.885 with 95% CI (0.848-0.916) which indicates good reliability when compared to manual assessments by experienced pathologists. DeepLIIF exhibits excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement and ensures consistency in Ki-67 scoring. Additionally, DeepLIIF significantly reduces analysis time, making it a valuable tool for high-throughput clinical settings. Conclusion: This study showcases the potential of open-source/open-access user-friendly deep learning platforms, such as DeepLIIF, for the quantification of Ki-67 in neuroendocrine tumors. The analytical validation presented here establishes the reliability and robustness of this innovative method, paving the way for its integration into routine clinical practice. Accurate and efficient Ki-67 assessment is paramount for risk stratification and treatment decisions in NETs and AI offers a promising solution for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and patient care in the field of neuroendocrine oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.