Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38077443›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Schrödinger's yeast: the challenge of using transformation to compare fitness among

Linnea Sandell, Stephan G König, Sarah P Otto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linnea SandellDepartment of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Stephan G KönigDepartment of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1597-3628
Sarah P OttoDepartment of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3042-0818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How the number of genome copies modifies the effect of random mutations remains poorly known. In yeast, researchers have investigated these effects for knock-out or other large-effect mutations, but have not accounted for differences at the mating-type locus. We set out to compare fitness differences among strains that differ in ploidy and/or zygosity using a panel of spontaneously arising mutations acquired in haploid yeast from a previous study. To ensure no genetic differences, even at the mating-type locus, we embarked on a series of transformations, which first sterilized and then temporarily introduced plasmid-borne mating types. Despite these attempts to equalize the haplotypes, fitness variation introduced during transformation swamped the differences among the original mutation-accumulation lines. While colony size looked normal, we observed a bi-modality in the maximum growth rate of our transformed yeast and determined that many of the slow growing lines were respiratory deficient ("petite"). Not previously reported, we found that yeast that were

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeYeast, DriedDNA HelicasesDNA TopoisomerasesHaploidyMutationMutation AccumulationDNA HelicasesDNA TopoisomerasesRDH54 protein, S cerevisiaeDominanceFitnessPlasmidPloidySaccharomyces cerevisiaeTransformationZygosity

Identifiers

PMID38077443
PMCPMC10704993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.