ArticlePeerJ2023
Combination of serum CST1 and HE4 for early diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human epididymis protein 4: a potential prognostic biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Gynecologic Cancer Screening and Prevention: State of the Science and Practice.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Value of ADC in Distinguishing Endometrial Cancer from Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Within Molecular Subtypes.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Expression profiles and clinical significance of cystatin family genes in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Clinical Value of Vascular Cancer Thrombus and Myometrial Invasion Combined with Tumor Markers in Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis of Endometrial Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Optimal serological biomarkers have been absent for the early diagnosis of endometrial cancer, to date. In this study, we aimed to define the diagnostic performances of individual and combined detection of serum cysteine protease inhibitor 1 (CST1) with traditional tumor markers, including glycated antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: The performances of individual and combined detection of serum CST1, HE4, and CA125 were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescent immunoassay, respectively. A training data set of 67 patients with early EC, 67 patients with endometrial benign lesion (EBL), and 67 healthy controls (HC) was used to develop a predictive model for early EC diagnosis, which was validated by an independent validation data set. Results: In the training data set, serum CST1 and HE4 levels in the early EC group were significantly higher than in EBL/HC groups ( Conclusion: CST1 is a prospective serological biomarker for early EC diagnosis, and the combination of CST1 and HE4 contributes to the further improvement in the diagnosis of patients with early-stage EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.