ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2023
Using Machine Learning to Predict Antidepressant Treatment Outcome From Electronic Health Records.
Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of ketamine on reward processing in depressive disorders: a systematic review of neuroimaging studies.CNS spectrums · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning in the prediction of treatment response for emotional disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical psychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Interaction of artificial intelligence, mental disorders, and diverse data modalities: Potential treatment management based on the "method-disease-data" axis.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Data driven versus standard practice policies for personalized antidepressant treatment: a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Smart home Internet of Things-based behavioural analysis for early detection of cognitive decline: toward Saudi future vision.mHealth · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Mental Health: Applications, Challenges, and the Clinician's Role.Current psychiatry reports · 2024Review
- Cross-EHR validation of antidepressant response algorithm and links with genetics of psychiatric traits.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Developing an individualized treatment rule for Veterans with major depressive disorder using electronic health records.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate if a machine learning approach can accurately predict antidepressant treatment outcome using electronic health records (EHRs) from patients with depression. Method: This study examined 808 patients with depression at a New York City-based outpatient mental health clinic between June 13, 2016 and June 22, 2020. Antidepressant treatment outcome was defined based on trend in depression symptom severity over time and was categorized as either "Recovering" or "Worsening" (i.e., non-Recovering), measured by the slope of individual-level Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score trajectory spanning 6 months following treatment initiation. A patient was designated as "Recovering" if the slope is less than 0 and as "Worsening" if the slope was no less than 0. Multiple machine learning (ML) models including L2 norm regularized Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) were used to predict treatment outcome based on additional data from EHRs, including demographics and diagnoses. Shapley Additive Explanations were applied to identify the most important predictors. Results: The GBDT achieved the best results of predicting "Recovering" (AUC: 0.7654 ± 0.0227; precision: 0.6002 ± 0.0215; recall: 0.5131 ± 0.0336). When excluding patients with low PHQ-9 scores (<10) at baseline, the results of predicting "Recovering" (AUC: 0.7254 ± 0.0218; precision: 0.5392 ± 0.0437; recall: 0.4431 ± 0.0513) were obtained. Prior diagnosis of anxiety, psychotherapy, recurrent depression, and baseline depression symptom severity were strong predictors. Conclusions: The results demonstrate the potential utility of using ML in longitudinal EHRs to predict antidepressant treatment outcome. Our predictive tool holds the promise to accelerate personalized medical management in patients with psychiatric illnesses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.