Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38077277›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2023

Using Machine Learning to Predict Antidepressant Treatment Outcome From Electronic Health Records.

Zhenxing Xu, Veer Vekaria, Fei Wang, Judith Cukor, Chang Su, Prakash Adekkanattu, Pascal Brandt, Guoqian Jiang, Richard C Kiefer, Yuan Luo and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zhenxing XuWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Veer VekariaWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-2250
Fei WangWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Judith CukorWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Chang SuTemple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Prakash AdekkanattuWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Pascal BrandtUniversity of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
Guoqian JiangMayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.
Richard C KieferMayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.
Yuan LuoNorthwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.
Luke V RasmussenNorthwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.
Jie XuUniversity of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.
Yunyu XiaoWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
George AlexopoulosWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Jyotishman PathakWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.

Funding

National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
Linking VA and non-VA data to study the risk of suicide in chronic pain patients.R01MH121907 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI OSLIN, DAVID W., PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2020 to 2024
$3.6M
Using claims data to study the association between Alzheimer's disease and suicidal behaviorsR01MH119177 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2019 to 2022
$3.3M
4/4: Leveraging EHR-linked biobanks for deep phenotyping, polygenic risk score modeling, and outcomes analysis in psychiatric disordersR01MH121922 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119177NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121907NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if a machine learning approach can accurately predict antidepressant treatment outcome using electronic health records (EHRs) from patients with depression. Method: This study examined 808 patients with depression at a New York City-based outpatient mental health clinic between June 13, 2016 and June 22, 2020. Antidepressant treatment outcome was defined based on trend in depression symptom severity over time and was categorized as either "Recovering" or "Worsening" (i.e., non-Recovering), measured by the slope of individual-level Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score trajectory spanning 6 months following treatment initiation. A patient was designated as "Recovering" if the slope is less than 0 and as "Worsening" if the slope was no less than 0. Multiple machine learning (ML) models including L2 norm regularized Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) were used to predict treatment outcome based on additional data from EHRs, including demographics and diagnoses. Shapley Additive Explanations were applied to identify the most important predictors. Results: The GBDT achieved the best results of predicting "Recovering" (AUC: 0.7654 ± 0.0227; precision: 0.6002 ± 0.0215; recall: 0.5131 ± 0.0336). When excluding patients with low PHQ-9 scores (<10) at baseline, the results of predicting "Recovering" (AUC: 0.7254 ± 0.0218; precision: 0.5392 ± 0.0437; recall: 0.4431 ± 0.0513) were obtained. Prior diagnosis of anxiety, psychotherapy, recurrent depression, and baseline depression symptom severity were strong predictors. Conclusions: The results demonstrate the potential utility of using ML in longitudinal EHRs to predict antidepressant treatment outcome. Our predictive tool holds the promise to accelerate personalized medical management in patients with psychiatric illnesses.

Identifiers

PMID38077277
PMCPMC10698704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.