Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38077261›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of global health2023

Can Clean Delivery Kits Prevent Infections? Lessons from Traditional Birth Attendants in Nigeria.

Adediwura Oladunni Arowosegbe, Iyabode Olabisi Dedeke, Olufunke Bolatito Shittu, David Ajiboye Ojo, Joy Stephen Amusan, Opeoluwa Iwaloye, Uwemedimo Friday Ekpo

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Adediwura Oladunni ArowosegbeDepartment of Microbiology, College of Biosciences, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-4828-018X
Iyabode Olabisi DedekeDepartment of Pediatrics, Federal Medical Center, Abeokuta, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-0721-0823
Olufunke Bolatito ShittuDepartment of Microbiology, College of Biosciences, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-5000-0015
David Ajiboye OjoDepartment of Microbiology, College of Biosciences, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Joy Stephen AmusanDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Osun State University, Osogbo, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3674-9174
Opeoluwa IwaloyeDepartment of Microbiology, College of Biosciences, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-9659-7379
Uwemedimo Friday EkpoDepartment of Pure and Applied Zoology, College of Biosciences, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-0543-5463
Binus University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In resource-poor settings, perinatal infections contribute significantly to maternal and neonatal deaths, and the use of clean delivery kits (CDKs) has been proposed as a tool to reduce the risk of infection-related deaths. This study aims to assess the acceptability and effectiveness of CDKs in preventing infections in deliveries attended by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Methods: The study was a cluster-randomized trial with 67 birth centres/clusters, 453 births/mothers, and 457 babies randomized to intervention or control arms; intervention involved supplementation of delivery with JANMA CDKs. Interviews were conducted at the birth homes, and the primary outcomes were neonatal infection and puerperal fever. The association between infection and perinatal risk factors was tested using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: CDKs were well accepted by TBAs. The incidence of puerperal fever and neonatal infection was 1.1% and 11.2%, respectively. Concurrent infection was found in 1 (0.22%) of the mother-neonate pair. There was no significant association between any of the sociodemographic factors and infection for both mothers and neonates. PROM and prolonged labour were significantly associated with puerperal infection. All mothers with puerperal fever were from the control group. Compared to the control group, the relative risk of puerperal infection and neonatal infection in the intervention group was 0.08 (0.004 -1.35, p = 0.079) and 0.64 (0.37 to 1.1, p = 0.10), respectively. Conclusion: CDKs hold promising results in attenuating maternal infections in resource-poor settings. Larger studies with greater statistical power are required to establish statistically reliable information.

Indexed as

Home ChildbirthMidwiferyPuerperal InfectionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNigeriaParturitionPregnancyClean Delivery kitsNeonatal InfectionNigeriaPuerperal FeverTraditional Birth AttendantsWASH

Identifiers

PMID38077261
PMCPMC10705026
OpenAlexW4389402362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.