Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38077229›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2023

Role of individual and combined impact of simvastatin and α-TCP in rat calvarial bone defect: An experimental study.

Surendar Sugumaran, Deepak Selvam, M S Nivedhitha, Karthik Ganesh Mohanraj, Bader O Almutairi, Selvaraj Arokiyaraj, Ajay Guru, Jesu Arockiaraj

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Surendar SugumaranDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
Deepak SelvamDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
M S NivedhithaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
Karthik Ganesh MohanrajDepartment of Anatomy, Biomedical Research Unit and Lab Animal Centre, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
Bader O AlmutairiDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Selvaraj ArokiyarajDepartment of Food Science & Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.
Ajay GuruDepartment of Cariology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
Jesu ArockiarajToxicology and Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Humanities, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603 203, Chengalpattu District, Tamilnadu, India.
Saveetha University · INKing Saud University · SASejong University · KRSRM Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bone substitutes have been used by doctors for a long time to treat osseous abnormalities. Recently, scientists have been searching for suitable materials to replace bone. Autogenous bone grafts are considered the gold standard for osseous regeneration. However, the limited availability of intraoral sources for grafting material often requires the use of secondary donor sites. Aim: This study aims to compare a control group of standard critical bone defect models treated without any bone transplants to critical size calvarial bony defects treated with various bone replacements, including simvastatin and α-tricalcium phosphate, while analyzing the healing patterns. Materials and Methods: In this investigation, 24 Wistar Albino rats weighing 200-250 g were utilized. The study included four groups, each consisting of six rats. Group I utilized deproteinized bovine xenograft, Group II used Simvastatin (0.1 mg), Group III used Simvastatin (0.1 mg) plus TCP, and Group IV served as the untreated calvarial defects group. After eight weeks of testing, the rats were euthanized, and the calvaria were extracted, decalcified in 20% formic acid, and prepared for histological analysis. Results: The newly produced osseous tissue consisted of woven and lamellar bone, which was observed in all deformities. The mean widths of new bone development in the SIMV with α-TCP (Group III) group after XENO (Group I) and the control group with no graft implantation were 160.33 ± 16.2 µm, 110.59 ± 11.5 µm, and 50.83 ± 5.5 µm, respectively. However, these differences did not show statistical significance (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The quantity and quality of newly produced osseous tissue were comparable in α-TCP with SIMV and XENO. However, inflammatory infiltration was 8more pronounced in regions where SIMV was present alone compared to the combination group.

Indexed as

Bone regenerationCalvarial defectSimvastatinXenograftα-tricalcium phosphate

Identifiers

PMID38077229
PMCPMC10699126
OpenAlexW4385155004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.