Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38077207›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Current role of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones: A scoping review.

Carlotta Nedbal, Victoria Jahrreiss, Clara Cerrato, Daniele Castellani, Wissam Khalid Kamal, Zeeshan Hameed, Vineet Gauhar, Patrick Juliebo-Jones, Lazaros Tzelves, Panagiotis Kallidonis and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery: best practices and future perspectives.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Carlotta NedbalUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Victoria JahrreissDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Clara CerratoDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Wissam Khalid KamalDepartment of Urology, King Fahad Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Zeeshan HameedDepartment of Urology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, NUHS, Singapore.
Patrick Juliebo-JonesDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group.
Lazaros TzelvesDepartment of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Greece.
Theodoros TokasDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T., Milser Str. 10, Hall in Tirol, 6060, Austria.
Bhaskar K SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATFather Muller Medical College Hospital · INKing Fahad Hospital Jeddah · SAMarche Polytechnic University · ITNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRNg Teng Fong General Hospital · SGTirol Kliniken · ATUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to review the current role of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the management of renal stones, with a focus on its efficacy and safety. The secondary outcome was to highlight the tips and tricks to improve the urologist's experience with ECIRS. Methods: A scoping review of the literature, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, was performed, using ECIRS and flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy as the search terms. All original articles were screened and included. Results: Thirty-three studies were included in the analysis. ECIRS showed a good efficacy and safety profile, with an excellent stone-free rate and a low rate of complications, mostly Clavien-Dindo I/II. With ECIRS, a reduction in the need for multiple access tracts was noted and direct visualization of the targeted calyx during the puncture increased the ability to attain transpapillary punctures, thereby reducing the amount of bleeding. Conclusion: ECIRS, as the first-line minimal access intervention, is safe and efficacious, particularly for achieving a stone-free status in patients with large complex stones in a single stage. The ability to gain access under direct vision and the reduction in the number of tracts, in both the supine and the prone positions, makes this procedure an attractive surgical choice.

Identifiers

PMID38077207
PMCPMC10704964
OpenAlexW4387349489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.