ArticleiScience2023
Development of a whole-slide-level segmentation-based dMMR/pMMR deep learning detector for colorectal cancer.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning for detecting early gastric cancer with white-light endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning for MSI-H in colorectal cancer whole slide images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate whole-slide-level prediction in the field of artificial intelligence identification of dMMR/pMMR from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) in colorectal cancer (CRC), we established a segmentation-based dMMR/pMMR deep learning detector (SPEED). Our model was approximately 1,700 times faster than that of the classification-based model. For the internal validation cohort, our model yielded an overall AUC of 0.989. For the external validation cohort, the model exhibited a high performance, with an AUC of 0.865. The human‒machine strategy further improved the model performance for external validation by an AUC up to 0.988. Our whole-slide-level prediction model provided an approach for dMMR/pMMR detection from H&E whole slide images with excellent predictive performance and less computer processing time in patients with CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.