Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076750›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2023

Prediction of Response Patterns during Conditional Discrimination Training across Data Recording Methods.

Delanie F Platt, Tom Cariveau, Paige Ellington, Alexandria Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Delanie F PlattDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Wilmington, NC 28403 USA.
Tom CariveauDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Wilmington, NC 28403 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7220-3902
Paige EllingtonDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Wilmington, NC 28403 USA.
Alexandria BrownDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Wilmington, NC 28403 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of an intervention is tied to the degree to which a program is implemented as described and the behavior analyst's ability to individualize the program based on client-specific factors. LeBlanc et al. (2020) found that training clinicians to use enhanced data sheets, which represent both the antecedent and response, resulted in greater procedural integrity when compared to standard data sheets. Additional benefits of enhanced data collection systems include the representation of potential error patterns, which may be used to modify the intervention program. The current study compared naïve participants' accuracy in predicting a client's performance when represented on standard and enhanced data sheets. Participants consistently identified error patterns on enhanced data sheets; however, performance did not differ across data collection methods when accurate responding or unpredictable controlling relations were shown. These findings suggest that enhanced measurement may facilitate the identification of error patterns during instruction for behavior analysts.

Indexed as

Data sheeterror analysiserrorsmeasurementposition biasstimulus bias

Identifiers

PMID38076750
PMCPMC10700256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.