Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076746›Full record

ReviewBehavior analysis in practice2023

The Apprentice Model 2.0: Enhancement of the Apprentice Model.

Breanne Hartley, Molly Dubuque

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior analysis in practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Breanne HartleyLittleStar ABA Therapy, West Lafayette, IN USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0425-3983
Molly DubuqueLittleStar ABA Therapy, West Lafayette, IN USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are not enough board certified behavior analysts (BCBAs) with specialization in the treatment of individuals with autism to meet the growing patient demand for applied behavior analysis (ABA) treatment. In addition, there are no streamlined, organization-led fieldwork supervision systems to aid in the professional development of Trainees to meet this need. This article describes enhancements made to the Apprentice Model (Hartley et al., 2016), emphasizing the mutual benefit to the Apprentice, the Supervising BCBA, the organization for which they are both employed, and perhaps most important, the field of behavior analysis. Within the organization where the Apprentice Model has been adopted, 88% of Apprentices who took the exam, since the 2022 modifications were applied, passed on their first attempt despite attending universities with 2021 reported pass rates ranging from 34%-60% (Behavior Analysts Certification Board [BACB], 2023). In addition, through the 6-year history of the adoption of the Apprentice Model, 70% of the organization's BCBAs who supervise a caseload of patients were prior Apprentices. Structuring a wide-scale supervision model within an organization creates opportunities for the Trainee to experience high-quality tailored fieldwork, it allows the Supervising BCBA to provide supervision under a well-organized and structured framework, and it permits the organization to employ high-quality, newly certified BCBAs to begin meeting patient treatment needs. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-023-00799-9.

Indexed as

ApprenticeFieldworkInnovationSupervisionTrainee

Identifiers

PMID38076746
PMCPMC10700283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.